Storm clouds
Uploaded: December 01, 2013
Michael Kelly December 01, 2013
Love the light in the clouds – makes them look translucent. Perhaps just a touch of noise reduction would make this even better. #1554572Kalena Randall December 01, 2013
I agree with Michael on this. The color is beautiful, but a touch of noise reduction might be necessary. #10912799Peter W. Marks December 02, 2013
My first reaction Mike and Kalena was "there isn't any noise even when I crank up the magnification to 500%" So as I very much respect your judgement guys I cleaned my glasses and tried looking again! Would I be right in thinking that what you are referring to is over-sharpening of the cloud edges rather than the more usual definition of noise, with random speckles of color or grain, particularly in dark areas ? It is very subjective of course but in this case my sharpening was very intentional in order to emphasize the 'storm(y) clouds'. I shot this in raw and the result was a very flat and unexciting image, so with the high-pass filter I pushed it until I obtained what I thought was a nice angry, threatening sky. Not photo-realistic of course but hopefully I achieved the end I pursued.Susan Williams December 02, 2013
I don't see any noise either. I do think it might be over-sharpened a bit and would take it back so the coulds retained a little more puffiness. I would gear it toward the one in the center foreground and the rest should adjust accordingly. Love the light, the colors and the drama, Peter. #10913229Dale Hardin December 02, 2013
I don't see noise either but do see lots of pixilization and artifacts in the sky similar to what one sees with excess filtering. Of course this image is subject to degradation in the posting process.Peter, was this heavily cropped? Would love to view the raw file. Mind emailing it to me? #10913445
Peter W. Marks December 02, 2013
No cropping Dale and as best I recall the only filter I used was the high-pass and then some adjustment with one of the PSE color 'enhancement'features to give the fiery red that I was looking for.Beth Spencer December 02, 2013
I really like the colors that are in the clouds and the light. I wonder if you can keep the color and cut back on the sharpening a bit. #10913640Jeff E Jensen December 02, 2013
I agree, the colors and light are really nice. #10913722Rita K. Connell December 02, 2013
I think you did well at getting the mood of these clouds. the color is pretty cool. I see a face of a electric eel with his mouth open does anyone else see it. Scary....!!!! #10913749Stephen Shoff December 02, 2013
I knew when I first browsed this from work this morning that I really want to get a good look at this when I got home. It has great color, a very nice image.I'll go with the noise crowd on this one Peter. In the dark sky area along the top in particular I see what I interpret to be color noise which has been reduced a lot (I know, that contradicts your record...I'm just trying to describe what I'm seeing). I also see bright halos round the dark cloud in the center and dark halos around bright cloud borders as well as a grainy look in mid-tones in the clouds. I would guess that is the intentional over-sharpening you referred to.
My suggestion is that you try a different approach. Go back to the original CR2 file and open it in your PSE. It will open directly in ACR. Use Vibrance and Clarity adjustments in ACR to see how close you can get to your goal. Then hit Open and finish your post-processing in PSE. (Note: I verified the Vibrance and Clarity adjustments were present in PSE7.)
I would echo Dale, I'd kind of like to spend a little time playing with this myself. I wouldn't mind if you'd include me when you send the file to Dale (StephenS_CP@comcast.net)
#10913752
Peter W. Marks December 03, 2013
Hi Stephen. We seem to have had somewhat diverse opinions on the 'noise'. Some see it, some don't; makes me wonder what judges see on their screens when they look at our images.Peter W. Marks December 03, 2013
Oh dear! I really can spell 'eel' and 'at' but my fingers and brain aren't too connected this morning. #10913948Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Peter W. Marks.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!