Untitled
Uploaded: October 03, 2011
f/6.3, 1/20 sec, ISO 200; EF 17-40mm f4L @ 29 mm.
This church is near Wenceslaus Square in Prague. Its "claim to fame" is that it has the largest alter in the city.
Exif: F Number: 6.3, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 1/20 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 200, White balance: Manual white balance, FocalLength: 29.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Stephen Shoff October 03, 2011
I haven't been posting very frequently so I thought I'd put this one up more for its interest value than for critical comment. Critical comments are, of course welcome, but I'm not sure I'll spend a lot of time trying to make this image into more than what it is.I've also included the original that this is cropped from. #1412777
Aimee C. Eisaman October 04, 2011
What an amazing building....just fantastic! You could spend days there photographing all the little details from different angles. I agree with you there isn't much you can do with this because the symmetry is off, but it is really interesting. Thanks for sharing! :~) #9715647Debbie E. Payne October 04, 2011
Thanks for sharing, Stephen. I, too, think this is an incredible ceiling and would be hard pressed to recommend any changes despite the "offness" -(if there is such a word...) of symmetry Architectural shots are so difficult for me to get right and take so much time post-processing to get just so. Not sure I would bother with these as they are magnificent as is. #9715902Teresa H. Hunt October 04, 2011
Wow what an amazing building. I think Aimee is right, you could probably spend days shooting the little details! #9715915Anthony L. Mancuso October 04, 2011
Stunning architecture you captured here Steven....would love to make it back to Europe to shoot someday... #9716669Jeff E Jensen October 05, 2011
I love the details in this. I could kill a good bit of time in a place like this. #9718592Michael Kelly October 05, 2011
It is magnificent. I do like the crop that you took from the original.It does have that slight feel of being {off}, but still a lot of great detail and an interesting architectural shot. I could work with the tools to stretch and play forever and not get it any more {on} than you have it shown here. #9719202
Stephen Shoff October 05, 2011
Very often, in a setting like this, I'm very reluctant to do what it takes to get the symmetry perfect, if for no other reason than that these are active churches and I want to be respectful of the worshippers. Many times, too, I'm not by myself and I can't take the time. Its possible in this one I might have been able to unobtrusively set up a better diagonal.I did do some straightening of the lines to reduce the wide-angle effects, Mike, but I knew I was off-center and wouldn't be able to change that, so didn't try.
My goal was to capture the elegance and detail of the ceiling.
Debbie, very often these pictures end up being the easiest for me to work with. I usually spend time reducing the wide-angle effects and finding a good crop. But other than that, it usually isn't much more than setting the color temperature, black and white points, and then adding some contrast and sharpening.
Thanks, all, for your comments.
#9719214
Debbie E. Payne October 05, 2011
Stephen, I am just now starting to get the hang of the skewing, distorting, scaling and all those other tools that can accomplish the "straight" shot. But some times I rebel and take something that I know will never be straight. And as to taking pictures in public places and especially places of worship where I would never get down on my hands and knees or lay flat out on the floor; both out of respect as well as making a spectacle out of myself getting up. So...my pics from Vegas were pretty straightforward and not what I might otherwise do with no audience around. #9719273Peter W. Marks October 07, 2011
Very interesting Stephen and is a place and building I am never likely to visit. But now of course your image immediately prompted me to Google off to Prague and I know a whole lot of stuff about it. Excellant work. #9722566Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Stephen Shoff.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!